| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
|
Home : 2001 : August : 25
The idea is that we are all teaching the same thing at approximately
It all sounds great to the admin folks, on paper. The trouble comes when it's time for all 4 science teachers to teach electricity, and we only have classroom kits for 1! No one thought of the supply problem, and no one seems too worried when we bring it up. Many people also think it undermines a teacher's ability to be creative with the way they build their lessons. For instance, I like to teach about acids and bases AFTER I have taught atoms. Students then have a base for understanding the chemical bonding and the positive and negative charges. But the curriculum map puts acids and bases in October. Sure, I can teach it then, but the kids won't have a frame of reference to understand WHY acids and bases form until later. As you can see, I am lukewarm (at best) about curriculum mapping. It is probably one of those fads that will fade with time. But in the meantime it is a thorn in our side in my district.
What people are currently discussing in the ProTeacher Community: |
| ||||||||